Julia Stusek vs Lara Pfeifer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Stusek vs L. Pfeifer

Julia Stusek

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

703

C. Rank

882

703

Best Rank

531

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Lara Pfeifer

ITA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

703

C. Rank

882

703

Best Rank

531

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Stusek 1 - 0 Pfeifer

They have played 2 sets in total, with Julia Stusek winning 2 and Lara Pfeifer winning 0. The last match between Julia Stusek and Lara Pfeifer was at the W15 Bucharest, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Julia Stusek getting the victory 7-5 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Stusek	1
Pfeifer	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) W15 Bucharest(02-18-25)

Stats

Julia Stusek

Lara Pfeifer

J. Stusek vs L. Pfeifer H2H Profile

J. Stusek	Stats	L. Pfeifer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
59.32% (35-24)	Career Total W/L	52.19% (119-109)
1	Indoor	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Stusek vs L. Pfeifer Match Preview:

Recent Trends in Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Stusek and Pfeifer have exhibited notable differences in their second serve performance. Stusek boasts a 39.13% success rate, while Pfeifer has demonstrated a slightly higher rate of 41.78%. It's worth noting that this statistical aspect bears a profound impact on accurately predicting match outcomes.
Examining Return Game Statistics: Careful examination of return game statistics reveals intriguing disparities between Stusek and Pfeifer. In recent form, Stusek has triumphed in 42.5% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Pfeifer has dominated with a remarkable 54.49% success rate. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Stusek secures victory in 26.23% of cases, while Pfeifer outshines with an impressive 47.08%. These figures hold significant influence over determining the favored contender in their impending head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing Performance Under Pressure: Recent analysis indicates that Stusek and Pfeifer exhibit contrasting abilities to salvage breakpoints when under pressure. Stusek impressively saves 44.44% of breakpoints, while Pfeifer displays impeccable resilience, saving 47.34%. Unquestionably, this statistic may prove invaluable for in-game betting predictions.
Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the past year, Stusek has clinched victory in 28.57% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 2/5, in contrast to Pfeifer's remarkable performance of winning 59.02% of matches, demonstrating a remarkable win-loss record of 36/25. These figures provide a holistic overview of their head-to-head prediction.
Exploiting the Best Surface: A meticulous examination of Stusek and Pfeifer's career surface win percentages illuminates intriguing disparities. Stusek thrives on hard courts with an impressive 71% win rate (W/L 5/2), while their performance dwindles on grass courts, failing to secure a single win with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/2). Conversely, Pfeifer excels on hard courts with a 57% win rate (W/L 85/65) but struggles on indoor hard courts, with no victories (W/L 0/5).
Leveraging Player Level Analysis: Over the past year, Stusek primarily competed in Future, Satellites, and ITF tournaments worth $10K, triumphing in 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/1). On the other hand, Pfeifer predominantly honed their skills in comparable tournaments, winning 60.53% of matches (W/L 23/15). Therefore, when comparing statistics between players to predict the favorite, it's essential to consider the level at which they've been competing.
Assessing Opponent Quality Statistics: In the last twelve months, Stusek has consistently battled opponents with an average rank of 210, while Pfeifer has faced more formidable competitors, with an average rank of 439.67. This aspect sheds light on the level of competition each player has encountered and must be incorporated into the prediction process.
Decoding Deciding Set Performance: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it becomes crucial to examine how players perform during decisive sets. Remarkably, Stusek has struggled, failing to secure victory in any of the deciding sets played in the past twelve months. Conversely, Pfeifer has impressively won 44% of all matches played on tour that have reached a deciding set. This factor carries significant weight when deliberating on the possible match outcome.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While a player's historical performance serves as a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it becomes equally important to account for their performance in the ongoing event. Hence, it is recommended to refer to the section below to ascertain an in-form player's recent performance within the current event. Additionally, certain players display enhanced performance at specific events, lending further insight into determining the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion Rates: To offer insightful in-game live betting tips, careful evaluation of recent form reveals that Stusek converts 37.5% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Pfeifer masterfully capitalizes on 54.19% of chances to break their opponents' serves. These figures provide invaluable guidance during critical moments in the match.
If you seek models that proficiently predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent resource (Warning: Only for enthusiasts captivated by meticulous statistics).

Julia Stusek vs Lara Pfeifer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Stusek vs L. Pfeifer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Stusek	Stats	L. Pfeifer
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
3	Aces (Total)	0
6	Total Double Faults	4
1:29:20	Average Match Time	1:29:20
50% (33/66)	1st Serve %	53% (32/60)
61% (20/33)	1st Serve Win %	50% (16/32)
58% (19/33)	2nd Serve Win %	57% (16/28)
44% (4/9)	Break Pts Won %	50% (3/6)
47% (28/60)	Return Points Win %	41% (27/66)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Stusek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Solarino - 10-11-2025
SF Deborah ChiesaD. Chiesa	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
QF Maria TomaM. Toma	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Barbara DessolisB. Dessolis	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Victoria PohleV. Pohle	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
W15 Solarino - 03-11-2025
SF Deborah ChiesaD. Chiesa	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

L. Pfeifer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Monastir - 07-04-2025
QF Carolyn AnsariC. Ansari	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats
R2 Maelle LeclercqM. Leclercq	W	6-3 0-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Maria TomaM. Toma	W	3-0 ret.	Stats
W15 Monastir - 31-03-2025
R1 Iva IvanovaI. Ivanova	L	4-6 7-5 6-4	Stats
W15 Monastir - 24-03-2025
R2 Elena MilovanovicE. Milovanovic	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Stusek vs L. Pfeifer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Stusek	Stats	L. Pfeifer
59.32% (35/24)	YTD Win/Loss	52.19% (119/109)
57.46% (77/57)	Sets Win/Loss	52.10% (260/239)
53.41% (627/547)	Games Win/Loss	51.48% (2313/2180)
71.43% (10/4)	Hard Win/Loss	56.25% (90/70)
46.67% (7/8)	Clay Win/Loss	48.33% (29/31)
64.29% (18/10)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/8)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.09	Aces Per Game	0.05
50	Aces Total	105
0.43	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
243	Total Double Faults	475
1:30:2	Average Match Time	1:13:49
217.56	Average Opponent Rank	447.54
62% (2227/3575)	1st Serve %	70% (7418/10635)
60% (1332/2227)	1st Serve Win %	56% (4177/7418)
44% (599/1348)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (1443/3217)
51% (239/471)	Break Points Won % (Total)	52% (756/1454)
47% (1652/3514)	Return Points Win %	48% (5241/10896)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
54.55% (18/15)	Challenger W/L	44.44% (20/25)
70.83% (17/7)	Futures W/L	54.10% (99/84)
59% (35/59)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (112/215)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
57% (4/7)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (15/30)
56% (9/16)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (26/54)
89% (36/32)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (124/108)
11% (36/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (124/16)
13% (23/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (104/11)